Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
Open AccessResearch

Multiparameter flow cytometric analysis of CD4 and CD8 T cell subsets in young and old people

Sven Koch1,3 email, Anis Larbi1 email, Evelyna Derhovanessian1 email, Dennis Özcelik1 email, Elissaveta Naumova2 email and Graham Pawelec1 email

1Center for Medical Research (ZMF), University of Tübingen, Waldhörnlestrasse 22, 72072, Tübingen, Germany

2Central Laboratory of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Alexandrovska, 1 Georgy Sofiisky Str., 1431, Sofia, Bulgaria

3Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Experimental Immunology, Meibergdreef 9, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

author email corresponding author email

Immunity & Ageing 2008, 5:6doi:10.1186/1742-4933-5-6

Published: 25 July 2008

Abstract

Background

T cell-mediated immunity in elderly people is compromised in ways reflected in the composition of the peripheral T cell pool. The advent of polychromatic flow cytometry has made analysis of cell subsets feasible in unprecedented detail.

Results

Here we document shifts in subset distribution within naïve (N), central memory (CM) and effector memory (EM) cells defined by CD45RA and CCR7 expression in the elderly, additionally using the costimulatory receptors CD27 and CD28, as well as the coinhibitory receptors CD57 and KLRG-1, to further dissect these. Although differences between young and old were more marked in CD8 than in CD4 cells, a similar overall pattern prevailed in both. Thus, the use of all these markers together, and inclusion of assays of proliferation and cytokine secretion, may enable the construction of a differentiation scheme applicable to CD4 as well as CD8 cells, with the model (based on Romero et al.) suggesting the progression N→CM→EM1→EM2→pE1→pE2→EM4→EM3→E end-stage non-proliferative effector cells.

Conclusion

Overall, the results suggest that both differences in subset distribution and differences between subsets are responsible for age-related changes in CD8 cells but that differences within rather than between subsets are more prominent for CD4 cells.


© 1999-2009 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.